6 MIN READ · Pedro Thomaz

Will AI Video Replace Product and Automotive Photography? What Sora and Veo Can't Shoot

Generative video is good enough to fool a scroll-by and nowhere near good enough to sell a €120k car. Here's the line we draw between AI and a real shoot — and where we already use both.
Will AI Video Replace Product and Automotive Photography? What Sora and Veo Can't Shoot

"Can't you just generate it?" We get this on nearly every photography quote now. Sora, Veo and the rest are genuinely impressive, and genuinely changing parts of our workflow. They are also nowhere near replacing a real shoot for the work clients actually pay us for. Both things are true. Here's where the line sits in 2026.

We shoot for Mercedes-Benz, Aston Martin and Hyundai in Portugal. That work is the test case, because cars are where generative video breaks most visibly.

What AI video genuinely can't do yet

Where we already use AI — happily

The rule we shoot by

If the product is the subject and the buyer is spending real money, shoot it for real. Everything around it is fair game for AI. The hero is photography; the campaign machine around the hero is increasingly hybrid. That split is why our cost-per-asset keeps falling while our shoot quality doesn't.

What this means for your budget

Stop framing it as "AI or a photographer." The studios that win in 2026 use both deliberately: real capture for the assets that carry the sale, generative tooling for the volume around them. We quote it that way on purpose — fewer shoot days, more deliverables per day, the hero still real.

Planning a product or automotive campaign and not sure what to shoot versus generate? Send us the shot list — we'll mark it up honestly.